From Clipboards to Cloud: Modernizing Your CMT Workflow
Discover how Aldoa helps CMT labs streamline field data collection, reporting, and compliance by moving from paper forms to a cloud-based digital...
Construction Materials Testing (CMT) is the backbone of infrastructure quality and safety. From concrete and asphalt to soils and aggregates, accurate testing ensures projects meet regulatory requirements, safety standards, and performance expectations.
But the days of clipboards, spreadsheets, and manual data entry are over. Today’s CMT labs and engineering firms rely on specialized software to streamline data collection, improve accuracy, and deliver faster reports to clients.
With so many options on the market, the question becomes: what is the best software for construction materials testing in 2025? In this article, we’ll compare the top tools, share evaluation criteria, and explain why Aldoa stands out as the leading choice for modern CMT labs.
Construction Materials Testing software is a digital platform designed to manage the workflow of testing building and infrastructure materials. Key functions include:
Sample tracking: log and identify each sample from field to lab.
Test management: schedule, record, and track test progress.
Compliance validation: ensure ASTM, AASHTO, and local standards are met.
Automated reporting: produce standardized reports for clients, agencies, and contractors.
Data accessibility: enable cloud or mobile access for field technicians and lab staff.
The right CMT software eliminates double entry, reduces human error, and accelerates turnaround times — all while ensuring that every test result meets strict compliance rules.
To identify the best software for construction materials testing in 2025, we evaluated each platform using these criteria:
Standards Compliance: Does it support ASTM, AASHTO, and local DOT standards out of the box?
Reporting Speed & Accuracy: How quickly can labs deliver accurate, professional reports?
Ease of Use: Is the interface intuitive for both lab technicians and field crews?
Integration Capability: Can it connect with other tools like project management software, billing systems, or LIMS?
Deployment Options: Is it cloud-based, on-premise, or hybrid?
Customer Support & Training: How well does the provider help clients onboard and optimize their workflows?
Software | Compliance | Cloud Access | Reporting Speed | Integration | Best For |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aldoa | ASTM, AASHTO, DOT | Yes | Excellent | CSV | CMT labs & geotechnical |
MetaField | ASTM, AASHTO | Yes | Good | Limited | Field-heavy workflows |
QESTLab | ASTM, AASHTO | Partial | Good | ERP focus | Large enterprises |
LabWorks | ASTM, AASHTO | No (on-prem) | Good | Lab-focused | Labs with in-house IT |
Excel/Manual | None | No | Poor | None | Small low-volume labs |
Overview:
Aldoa is built specifically for geotechnical engineering and construction materials testing firms. Its strength lies in combining standards compliance with modern cloud accessibility, and an all-in-one solution.
Pros:
Pre-built forms and customization that comply with ASTM & AASHTO standards.
Cloud-based: access anywhere, from any device: mobile, tablet, and desktop with offline capabilities.
Customizable reporting templates and pre-built templates, such as Moisture Density proctors.
Fast onboarding with guided training and U.S. based support.
Cons:
No CAD integration (not typically required for CMT workflows).
Best For:
CMT labs and geotechnical engineering firms that need fast, compliant reporting and centralized data access.
Overview:
MetaField emphasizes mobile-friendly field data collection and rapid field-to-lab sync.
Pros:
Mobile app.
Cloud-based.
Good for field-heavy workflows.
Cons:
Less flexibility in report customization.
Limited integration options.
Overview:
Part of Spectra QEST, QESTLab is tailored for large organizations with integrated enterprise systems.
Pros:
Extensive compliance library.
ERP integration.
Cons:
Complex setup.
Higher cost.
Overview:
LabWorks is a traditional lab software with strong internal controls.
Pros:
Reliable for on-premise IT setups.
Long industry track record.
Cons:
No cloud access.
Less suited for distributed teams.
Overview:
Some labs still rely on Excel or manual logs. While cost-effective, it’s slow, error-prone, and non-compliant in many regions.
Unlike generic lab software, Aldoa is purpose-built for CMT and geotechnical labs. Key differentiators:
Sector Specialization: Features designed specifically for CMT workflows.
Compliance First: ASTM & AASHTO compliant forms.
Cloud Accessibility: Real-time updates for teams in multiple locations.
Customizable Reports: Tailored for clients, DOTs, and contractors.
Clients have reported up to 60% faster reporting times after adopting Aldoa.
For construction materials testing labs in 2025, the choice is clear: Aldoa delivers the best combination of compliance, speed, and usability.
Next Step: Book a free demo and see how Aldoa can transform your lab’s efficiency.
Discover how Aldoa helps CMT labs streamline field data collection, reporting, and compliance by moving from paper forms to a cloud-based digital...
Explore our 2025 guide to the best project management software tailored for civil, geotech, and environmental engineers. Compare features, pricing &...
Discover the best software for engineering companies in 2025. Compare tools like Aldoa, Procore, and Newforma to streamline project workflows and...
Purpose-built for consultants and engineers. The easy-to-use system helps your team complete projects on time, stay within budget, and increase profitability.