Geotechnical & Materials Testing Blog | Aldoa

The Complete Guide to Soil Boring Logs for Geotechnical Engineers in 2026

Written by Aldoa | Nov 12, 2025 8:33:18 PM

The Complete Guide to Soil Boring Logs for Geotechnical Engineers in 2026

Soil boring logs are the backbone of geotechnical investigations. They document subsurface conditions, identify restrictive layers, and inform design decisions that affect safety, cost, and schedule. Yet many teams still rely on clipboards and spreadsheets, which introduces errors and delays.

This guide explains what to include on a boring log, how to plan field exploration, and how to interpret results. It also shows how modern software like Aldoa helps geotechnical firms create accurate boring logs faster and connect field and lab data in one workflow.

What is a soil boring log

A soil boring log is a record of subsurface conditions observed and sampled during drilling. It typically includes location and elevation, drilling method, sample intervals and recovery, blow counts, lithology, groundwater conditions, photos, and notes that together form a defensible profile for design.

Why boring logs matter in geotechnical engineering

  • Risk reduction: Early visibility into weak or variable strata prevents surprises during construction.
  • Design efficiency: Bearing capacity, settlement predictions, and groundwater control all rely on accurate subsurface data.
  • Regulatory compliance: Many permits and public agency manuals expect borings, pits, or infiltration tests in the vicinity of proposed facilities.
  • Client confidence: Clear logs and traceable data build trust and speed approvals.

How many borings do you need

The right number depends on site size, variability, structure loads, and local guidance. For small facilities or infiltration practices, one to two explorations might suffice. As area and complexity grow, add locations to capture variability and confirm depth to bedrock and groundwater. A practical rule: increase spacing in uniform sites and tighten spacing in filled, urban, or geologically complex areas.

Tip: If you discover unexpected materials or refusal, add offset borings to reduce uncertainty.

Common sampling and drilling methods

Method Typical depth Speed What it is good for Notes
Soil probe ≤ 3 ft Fast Shallow profile checks Limited data, not for design on its own
Hand or power auger ≤ 50 ft Moderate Unconsolidated soils No blow counts with hand auger
Test pits ≤ 20 ft Fast Visual logging and bulk samples Requires excavation equipment and safety controls
Direct Push (DPT) 60–100+ ft Fast Continuous sampling with minimal cuttings No SPT N-values
Rotosonic 100+ ft Fast Continuous core through difficult formations Mobilization costs can be higher
Hollow Stem Auger with SPT 100+ ft Moderate Foundation investigations, infiltration decisions Provides SPT N-values and flexible sampling

Choose methods that match project goals. If you need blow counts for density or consistency, plan for SPT with hollow stem auger.

Disturbed vs. undisturbed samples

  • Disturbed samples (split-spoon, bulk, auger cuttings) are suitable for classification, grain size, and index tests. Split-spoon sampling during SPT also gives you N-values.
  • Undisturbed samples (thin-walled tube, Shelby, piston) preserve structure and are used for shear strength and consolidation testing. These are less common for infiltration screening but essential for settlement and strength evaluation.

How to order and manage a boring program

If possible, have a geotechnical engineer onsite during drilling to coordinate locations, adjust intervals when conditions change, and document observations. Clear instructions for drillers will improve outcomes:

  • If split-spoon recovery is less than 6 inches, drill two feet deeper and resample.
  • When a confining or restrictive layer is suspected, reduce intervals to two feet to bracket the transition.
  • Record reasons for low recovery.
  • If refusal occurs before target depth, offset and blind drill to previous refusal, then continue with sampling.
  • Request complete field logs with soil type, recovery, blow counts, groundwater observations, and photos.

What to include on a boring log

A defensible log has consistent identifiers and complete metadata:

  • Boring ID and project information
  • Coordinates and ground surface elevation
  • Dates and times
  • Rig and drilling method
  • Sampling method and depths
  • Sample recovery
  • SPT N-values and remarks on driving resistance
  • Soil descriptions with USCS classification, color, moisture, inclusions, and structure
  • Layer boundaries and thickness
  • Depth to groundwater and subsequent readings
  • Depth to bedrock and refusal
  • Photos, sketches, and any anomalies

Pro tip: Use standard forms and controlled vocabulary for soil descriptions to keep logs consistent across crews and projects.

Interpreting boring logs and identifying restrictive layers

Restrictive layers such as dense clays, cemented zones, perched water, or bedrock limit infiltration and can cause perched groundwater. When interpreting logs:

  • Focus on the least permeable layer within the design depth because it controls infiltration.
  • Compare SPT N-values, plasticity indications, moisture, and color mottling to locate seasonal saturation.
  • Confirm layer continuity between borings before making site-wide assumptions.
  • If a restrictive layer lies close to the proposed facility elevation, consider alternatives or engineering measures.

Lab tests that support boring log interpretation

  • Grain size analysis (ASTM D6913 + D7928 or legacy D422) to classify sands and silts and identify well graded versus poorly graded soils.
  • Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318) for plasticity and soil behavior type.
  • Moisture content (ASTM D2216) to support groundwater interpretation.
  • PSD curves provide clarity when evaluating infiltration potential. If a large fraction passes the No. 200 sieve, infiltration performance will be limited.

From paper to digital: soil boring log software

Moving from paper to digital improves accuracy and speed:

  • Structured data capture: Standardized forms ensure consistent fields such as recovery, N-values, and USCS.
  • Field to lab continuity: Field crews can initiate lab tests from the borehole log so the lab sees upcoming work before samples arrive.
  • Automated reports: Generate professional boring logs and cross-sections with fewer manual steps.
  • Audit trail: Photos, coordinates, and timestamps travel with each sample.

How Aldoa streamlines your borehole logging workflow

Aldoa is a modern data and workflow platform built for geotechnical and construction materials testing teams. It centralizes your boring log process from scheduling through reporting.

Plan and dispatch: Create work orders, assign the right driller or technician, and attach maps and forms so crews know exactly what to collect.

Capture field data once: Log sample intervals, recovery, and SPT N-values in structured forms. Attach photos and site notes. Initiate lab tests from the field to give the lab a head start.

Connect lab results automatically: As tests are completed, results flow back into the boring log and the project record. No retyping. Fewer errors.

Generate reports faster: Produce professional boring logs, well diagrams, and project summaries ready for client delivery or inclusion in geotechnical reports.

Frequently asked questions about soil boring logs